论刑法基本原则确立论文

论刑法基本原则确立论文

【摘要】

我国现行刑法总则部分（第3、4、5条），法律面前人人平等、罪刑法定、罪刑相适应原则已经明文规定为刑法的基本报指导原则，成为刑事立法、司法活动必须遵行的基本原则。缘此，这三原则作为刑法基本原则的地位似乎已不可动摇。

然而,笔者依然有所质疑。

是否可以因为刑法基本原则已落户于刑法典中，或因为之前之后曾经大规模地讨论过，现在就可袖手不问了，或者说这个问题是否真的业已解决？诚恐不然。

首先，刑法对刑法基本原则的规定只是“已然”，未必是“必然”或“应然”，这自然是由法的滞后性、不周延性等先天不足造成的。其次，法学理论研究不仅仅是作为某部法律规范的“法窑”而存在的，而应为整个法学进步的引擎，既务实又要有前瞻性。再次，整个社会都在不断发展，立法和司法环境也在改变。

故此，笔者认为旧题重拾亦是有以。

谈到刑法基本原则，我们无法回避另一相关概念，既法的原则 。

本文着意从法理的角度分析了何为法的原则、法的原则的分类，以求理清法的原则与基本法律原则的关系。以此为阶，本文的一个重要内容即是以比较的眼光对刑法基本原则进行研究，即从刑法基本原则与宪法基本原则以及刑法基本原则与民法基本原则的对比分析中找出刑法基本原则的各方面特性，以此进一步检验已有的及新近的提法，并力求对以后刑法基本原则可能出现的提法准备辨认手段。

【关键词】

法的原则 刑法基本原则 宪法基本内原则 民法基本原则 刑法平等适用原则

Abstract:

In the General Rules (item3, 4,5) of the current criminal law of our country, equal status from criminal law principle, crime and penalty by law principle and crime equaling penalty principle have been laid down in clause clearly as fundamental guiding principles, and the three so turn basic principles which must be obeyed in the course of law making and performing, because of this, it seems that the position of the three as the basic principle in the criminal law could not be removed.

However, the author believes it to be inconvincible.

Could we be relaxed and lie comfortably just because the basic principle of criminal law has resided in the criminal law or it has been explored by lots of people before or after it was laid down in clause? Or the problem has really been solved? I’m really afraid not.

Firstly, that the basic principle has been fixed in the criminal law is just “so ” but not really “must be so ” or “should be so ”, which is naturally caused by the characteristics of criminal law such as “late” and “not-all-in” these born flaw. Secondly, the theory study o

[1] [2] [3] [4] 

【论刑法基本原则确立论文】相关文章：

论新儒学的复兴与宋学的确立04-27

论实践辩证法的确立04-28

刑法毕业论文模板03-17

论科研选题及基本原则04-26

确立04-29

论刑法对刑事诉讼法的保障功能05-01

刑法04-29

历史唯物主义存在论的确立04-27

论当代社会发展价值观的确立04-27

论人类—自然系统发展价值观的确立05-01